Sunday, June 17, 2012

Murdoch pushed Blair on Iraq: ex-media chief - Yahoo! News

Murdoch pushed Blair on Iraq: ex-media chief - Yahoo! News:

Murdoch pushed Blair on Iraq: ex-media chief


Rupert Murdoch took part in an "over-crude" attempt by US Republicans to push Tony Blair into action before the invasion ofIraq, the former British prime minister's ex-media chief claimed Saturday.
Alastair Campbell said the News Corporation media baron warned Blair in a phone call of the dangers in delaying signing up to the March 19, 2003 invasion, as part of an attempt to speed up Britain joining the military campaign.
The claim came in "The Burden of Power: Countdown to Iraq" -- the final volumes of Campbell's diaries from his years at Blair's side, which are being serialised in The Guardian newspaper.
Campbell suggested Murdoch made moves to help the right-wing Republican Party of then US president George W. Bush before the March 18 vote in the British parliament's lower House of Commons on deploying troops to Iraq, which was passed.
On March 11, 2003, Campbell wrote that Blair "took a call from Murdoch who was pressing on timings, saying how News International would support us, etc.
"Both TB and I felt it was prompted by Washington, and another example of their over-crude diplomacy. Murdoch was pushing all the Republican buttons, how the longer we waited the harder it got."
The following day he added: "TB felt the Murdoch call was odd, not very clever."
News International is News Corp.'s British newspaper arm, publishing The Times, The Sun and The Sunday Times.
Blair faced a tough challenge getting his centre-left Labour Party lawmakers to back Britain's involvement. They rebelled in large numbers.
Speaking to The Guardian, Campbell said Murdoch's intervention came "out of the blue".
"On one level (Murdoch) was trying to be supportive, saying 'I know this is a very difficult place, my papers are going to support you on this'. Fine.
"But I think Tony did feel that there was something a bit crude about it. It was another very right-wing voice saying to him: 'Look, isn't it about time you got on with this?'
"I think, as I recall Tony saying, he didn't think it was terribly clever."
In response, Murdoch's company said: "It is complete rubbish to suggest that Rupert Murdoch lobbied Mr Blair over the Iraq War on behalf of the US Republicans.
"Furthermore, there isn't even any evidence in Alastair Campbell's diaries to support such a ridiculous claim."
Campbell's diaries also recorded that Blair was "thwarted" from joining the euro currency in 2003 by his finance minister Gordon Brown, who took over as prime minister in 2007.
"Things just hadn't worked on the euro and TB was pretty fed up... The judgment was settling that GB had basically thwarted him," he wrote.
Brown moved so aggressively against Blair, demanding he step aside soon after the September 11, 2001 attacks on the United States, that Downing Street concluded in 2002 that Brown was "hell-bent on TB's destruction".
Brown "could be extraordinarily difficult to deal with", Campbell told The Guardian.
"But on the other hand he could be absolutely brilliant."
He said Blair toyed with sacking Brown but said he stuck with him as "'when it comes to ability, he and I are head and shoulders above the rest'.
"That may sound a bit arrogant but most people will accept that."

'via Blog this'

Thursday, June 14, 2012

A Back Door to the Public Option

A Back Door to the Public Option:


A Back Door to the Public Option

By Robert Reich, Robert Reich's Blog
14 June 12

ny day now the Supreme Court will issue its opinion on the constitutionality of the Accountable Care Act, which even the White House now calls Obamacare.
Most high-court observers think it will strike down the individual mandate in the Act that requires almost everyone to buy health insurance, as violating the Commerce Clause of the Constitution — but will leave the rest of the new healthcare law intact.
But the individual mandate is so essential to spreading the risk and cost of health care over the whole population, including younger and healthier people, that some analysts believe a Court decision that nixes the mandate will effectively spell the end of the Act anyway.
Yet it could have exactly the opposite effect. If the Court strikes down the individual mandate, health insurance company lobbyists and executives will swarm Capitol Hill seeking to have the Act amended to remove the requirement that they insure people with pre-existing medical conditions.They’ll argue that without the mandate they can’t afford to cover pre-existing conditions.
But the requirement to cover pre-existing conditions has proven to be so popular with the public that Congress will be reluctant to scrap it.
This opens the way to a political bargain. Insurers might be let off the hook, for example, only if they support allowing every American, including those with pre-existing conditions, to choose Medicare, or something very much like Medicare. In effect, what was known during the debate over the bill as the “public option.”
So in striking down the least popular part of Obamacare - the individual mandate - the Court will inevitably bring into question one of its most popular parts - coverage of pre-existing conditions. And in so doing, open alternative ways to maintain that coverage - including ideas, like the public option, that were rejected in favor of the mandate.
The fact is, there’s enough the public likes about Obamacare that if the Court strikes down the individual mandate that won’t be the end. It will just be the end of the first round.

Robert Reich is Chancellor's Professor of Public Policy at the University of California at Berkeley. He has served in three national administrations, most recently as secretary of labor under President Bill Clinton. He has written thirteen books, including "Locked in the Cabinet," "Reason," "Supercapitalism," "Aftershock," and his latest e-book, "Beyond Outrage." His 'Marketplace' commentaries can be found on publicradio.com and iTunes.

'via Blog this'