Wednesday, May 16, 2012

Karl Rove's evil genius breaks 'Obama's Promise' | Paul Harris | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk

Karl Rove's evil genius breaks 'Obama's Promise' | Paul Harris | Comment is free | guardian.co.uk:

Karl Rove's evil genius breaks 'Obama's Promise'

The new ad that attacks Obama from Rove-founded Super Pac Crossroads GPS is unfair, of course, but fiendishly effective
The Super Pac Crossroads GPS's advert 'Obama's Promise'. Video: YouTube

Who

It's a blast from the past in the shape of "Bush's brain", Karl Rove. Or, more accurately, the battle of the Super Pacs is finally beginning in the shape of Crossroads GPS, a Rove-founded organisation that aims to stop Obama's second term.

What

Much has been written about the enormous impact Super Pacs are going to have in 2012, now that they have been unburdened of campaign finance limits. This ad – which is airing in 10 states on a $25m buy – is the biggest shot yet from the Super Pac camp. The 60 seconds-long "Obama's Promise" seems to be a direct response (dollar-for-dollar) to the $25m recent launch of Team Obama's own advertising campaign. Of course, campaign laws mean that neither Mitt Romney nor Barack Obama can have any official links to the various Super Pacs that support them. (And if you believe that, I have a nice swamp down in Florida I'd like to sell you.)

When

The TV ad blitz began Wednesday 16 May.

Where

It is airing in Colorado, Florida, Iowa, Michigan, North Carolina, New Hampshire, Nevada, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Virginia. And that, ladies and gentleman, is pretty much the entire 2012 battleground right there. It is people in those states who will decide who sits in the White House next year.

How

Shedding the Republicans' usual image as the fusty old persons' party, the ad begins by spiralling in on an iPad on which the rest of the advert then plays out. How very hi-tech modern!
"President Obama's agenda promised so much," the ad announces, as a disembodied hand reaches out to control the iPad's touch screen. It then plays a series of statements from Obama on issues close to the hearts of American voters. After each one, the advert attempts to show how that pledge has been broken.
It's a simple idea and a strong one that is repeated multiple times. Which is about as "Rovian" a propaganda technique as they come. "We must help the millions of homeowners who are facing foreclosure," Obama says. The ad then announces angrily, "Promise broken," and points to fact that one in five home mortgages are still underwater. Then, Obama is shown promising no increase in taxes for people earning under $250,000 a year. "Broken!" the ad declares, saying healthcare reform will see 18 taxes raised.
In a similar vein, it claims Obama broke promises not to take people's healthcare coverage away and to halve the deficit. "Broken! He hasn't even come close. We need solutions, not promises," the ad sneers.
Even by the low standards of modern political attack ads, this one is massively disingenuous. After all, let's face it the Republican party is the side that has been happily blaming feckless homeowners, not gambling-addicted bankers, as the real cause of the Great Recession. And how does healthcare reform really add up to a broken tax promise for the middle class? If proper healthcare reform was brought in, it would actually be a huge boon to most people's pockets, as they and their corporate employers could stop paying absurdly high profit-driven insurance premiums.
As for the deficit line, well, perhaps the ad might want to mention the "say no to anything" stance the Tea Party-driven Republicans have been taking in Capitol Hill negotiations. But, of course, looking for facts and fairness in a political ad is like looking for honour among thieves. There isn't any and it is not important.
What matters is surface impression and this ad is powerful. It attacks Obama on his core appeal (as a decent person whom everybody admired in 2008) and paints him as a disappointing underachiever who has failed to improve the lot of ordinary Americans on the key issues they care about.
That strikes me as a powerful message to vital independent voters. It is also notable the ad mentions the impact of healthcare reform twice (in stark contrast to the Obama camp's apparent desire to ignore their signature domestic legislative achievement). That seems to suggest that Rove et al think that slamming healthcare reform is a winner for them. They could easily be right, too.
White House political adviser Karl Rove participates in a meeting on Health Savings AccountsRove in 2007. Photograph: Stefan Zaklin/EPA
Oh, Karl Rove. Your bewitching dark arts are still top-notch.
A final point. This ad actually benefits from not really being able to mention Mitt Romney (it is a Super Pac ad, after all). The one thing that would seriously blunt the ad's message would be a picture of a smiling, uber-wealthy, stiff-as-a-board Mitt Romney at the end of it. Being disappointed at Obama is one thing, but being reminded of the alternative is quite another.
Sadly for Obama, Romney is nowhere to be seen; and the advert deals a powerful, negative below-the-belt blow that just might leave Democratsfeeling winded in some key states.
Somewhere out there, Karl Rove is sitting down, stroking a white cat and laughing.

'via Blog this'

FOCUS | Obama and Gay Rights

FOCUS | Obama and Gay Rights:

By Michael Moore, Open Mike Blog
13 May 12

 am deeply moved by the announcement made a short while ago that President Obama has gone back to his original position in 1996 and come out publicly in support of same-sex marriage. It may seem like a risky move, but the majority of Americans already support the equal rights of gays and lesbians to marry. Public opinion has completely flipped since 2004. It's been a faster change than anyone could have predicted. But the older generation with their anti-gay views are replaced with a younger generation who are not as rigid, hate-filled, frightened, and bigoted as many of their elders. Hate to have to put it that way, but that's the truth. It's why we were able to have an African American president, and it's why I believe, in spite of all other proof to the contrary, things WILL get better in this country.
One other point: One reason the majority's opinion on this issue has changed is due, in large part, to the many of our gay and lesbian brothers and sisters who have taken the risk and come out of the closet. By doing so to their friends, family, neighbors, classmates and co-workers, they have forced people to deal with them as human beings. It is much harder to hate when that gay person is your son, that lesbian is your aunt, that homosexual is the person who covers for you on the job when you've got a sick kid, and that gay couple next door have the best-kept yard on the block (I'm not saying they're better at gardening, I'm just saying, they're neighbors, like anyone else). So, the more people said they were gay, the faster that fear and hate peeled away.
To all of our gay and lesbian citizens who have had to suffer for far too long in this "land of the free," thank you (and President Obama) for making us a true home of the brave.
Addendum #1: Yes, Obama did the wrong thing not speaking out before the North Carolina vote to ban gay marriage yesterday. I don't know the guy, but let me suggest this: perhaps he was as disgusted by that vote as the rest of us were today and just couldn't remain silent any longer. For those of you who are commenting and saying that this was just a calculated political move on his part - well, what politician, the day after the public votes one way, comes out the OTHER way. This is a swing state. A slick pol, on this day after, would have either remained silent or said something to show he is "with the people." He didn't do that. He took the position opposite to the one the majority of people in North Carolina took. Look, I have a lot of criticisms of Obama. I have been profoundly disappointed by him. But when he does the right thing, he needs to hear from the majority that we support what he did. You can't stay stuck in your cynicism every single day.
Addendum #2: I agree there are many older people who aren't bigots and who are more open-minded than their peers. But the polls are very clear on the age issue: According to ABC News tonight, 61% of those under 40 are in favor of legalizing gay marriage. But for those over 65, the majority are opposed and believe it should be illegal, with only 40% in favor of same-sex marriage. That is a HUGE generational gap - and a testimony to the older boomers who raised these "kids" to grow up to be loving, accepting human beings.

'via Blog this'

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

Rachel Maddow: Risky bet or free market consequence?

Rachel Maddow: Risky bet or free market consequence?:
Senator Byron Dorgan speaks up on JPMorgan's $2B, losses.

'via Blog this'

Key Murdoch Aide Rebekah Brooks to Be Prosecuted in Hacking Case

Key Murdoch Aide Rebekah Brooks to Be Prosecuted in Hacking Case:

Key Murdoch Aide Rebekah Brooks to Be Prosecuted in Hacking Case

Tuesday, 15 May 2012 09:30By John F Burns and Alan Cowell, The New York Times News Service | Report
Holding a cell phone(Photo: y.accesslab)London - Once among the most powerful figures in the British media, with close contacts stretching from her boss, Rupert Murdoch, to her friend, David Cameron, Rebekah Brooks, the former head of Mr. Murdoch's British newspaper empire, was told by prosecutors on Tuesday that she, her husband and four others will face charges of conspiring to pervert the course of justice in the hacking scandal that has burrowed into public life here.
It was the first time the charges have been formulated since police reopened inquiries into the affair in January 2011 and intensified their questioning six months later. The development brought the scandal to a watershed between criminal investigations, which have resulted in around 50 people being arrested and then set free on bail, and the prospect of trial before robed judges.
The six were accused variously of concealing documents, computers and archive material from officers investigating the scandal last July.
In the case of Ms. Brooks, 43, the accusations punctuated what had been a stellar career.
She was at various times the editor of Mr. Murdoch's two market-leading British tabloids — The Sun and the now defunct News of the World — and went on to become chief executive of News International, the British newspaper subsidiary of the Murdoch family's New York-based News Corporation.
At the same time, Ms. Brooks built a Rolodex of ties and access to the political elite and befriended successive prime ministers. The latest, Mr. Cameron, once signed text messages to her with the letters "LOL," believing it to mean "lots of love," she told a judicial inquiry only days ago.
The decision to prosecute Ms. Brooks and her husband was seen as a blow to Mr. Murdoch and Mr. Cameron, who has been depicted as maintaining a cozy friendship with Ms. Brooks both in opposition and in office as prime minister since 2010. But it drew a combative response from the couple even before the Crown Prosecution Service announced the detail of the charges.
"We have this morning been informed by the Office of the Department of Public Prosecutions that we are to be charged with perverting the course of justice," Ms. Brooks and her husband, Charlie Brooks, a racehorse trainer, said in a statement issued minutes before the Crown Prosecution Service, or C.P.S., announced that it would bring charges. "We deplore this weak and unjust decision."
"After the further unprecedented posturing of the C.P.S., we will respond later today after our return from the police station," the couple's statement said.
The Crown Prosecution Service said it had received a file of evidence from the police on March 27 concerning Ms. Brooks, her husband and five other suspects. The prosecutors' statement was read by Alison Levitt, the principal legal adviser to the director of public prosecutions.
"This statement is made in the interests of transparency and accountability to explain the decisions reached in respect of allegations that Rebekah Brooks conspired with her husband, Charles Brooks and others to pervert the course of justice," Ms. Levitt said.
The other suspects were identified as Cheryl Carter, Ms. Brooks' personal assistant, Mark Hanna, the head of security at News International, a chauffeur, Paul Edwards, and two security consultants, only one of whom was named as Daryl Jorsling.
Citing the two tests required for a prosecution, Ms. Levitt said that there was "sufficient evidence for there to be a realistic prospect of conviction" of all of them with the exception of the unidentified security consultant and that "a prosecution is required in the public interest in relation to each of the other six." No further action would be taken against the seventh, unidentified suspect.
The charges, Ms. Levitt said, were that between July 6 and 19, 2011, all six suspects conspired to "conceal material" from police officers and to "remove seven boxes of material from the archive of News International."
Ms. Brooks, Mr. Brooks, Mr. Hanna, Mr. Edwards and Mr. Jorsling also conspired "to conceal documents, computers and other electronic equipment" from Scotland Yard police officers.
"All these matters relate to the ongoing police investigation into allegations of phone hacking and corruption of public officials in relation to the News of the World and The Sun newspapers," Ms. Levitt said.
Prosecutors said evidence linked to five other unidentified people suspected of perverting the course of justice was under review. While the maximum legal penalty for the offense is life in prison, legal experts told the BBC, Ms. Brooks and her co-accused, if found guilty, could receive jail terms of several months or, possibly, a few years,
The six suspects were set to be arraigned at Westminster Crown Court on Tuesday or Wednesday but a full trial was unlikely before late 2012 or early 2013, these experts said.
The police investigation leading to the charges is one of three separate, but overlapping inquiries, including a parliamentary panel and a judicial inquiry under Lord Justice Brian Leveson. The charges set out on Tuesday had their roots at a time when Ms. Brooks was arrested and freed on bail last year as the scandal cascaded over Mr. Murdoch's British newspaper outpost, particularly The News of the World, which he ordered closed as a result of the scandal.
Up until last July, the affair had seemed to simmer until disclosures that a private investigator working for The News of the World hacked into the voice mail of Milly Dowler, an abducted teenager who was later found murdered in 2002. Public revulsion at the revelation led police and other investigators to challenge News International's assertions that hacking had been the work of a single "rogue reporter" who hacked into voice mail messages associated with the royal family in 2006.
Ms. Brooks, a striking figure with distinctive tresses of red hair, testified last week before a judicial inquiry into press ethics and behavior, chronicling a series of social engagements, phone calls and text messages exchanged with Mr. Cameron.
As a leading media figure, Ms. Brooks oversaw newspapers that took pride in influencing millions of voters at election time. In 2000, at the age of 31, she became the editor of the News of the World and went on to edit the top-selling daily tabloid The Sun from 2003 to 2009 before becoming chief executive of News International.
She resigned in July and was arrested on a variety of offenses, including alleged phone hacking and corruption, for which she has not been charged, as well as perverting the course of justice.
The police inquiries are divided into separate cases with different codenames — Operation Elveden, covering illegal payments to police officers; Operation Weeting, dealing with phone hacking; Operation Tuleta, investigating e-mail hacking; Operation Sasha, concerning alleged perversion of the course of justice; and Operation Kilo, handling unauthorized police leaks.
The police have said that more than 800 people were possible victims of phone hacking.
During her testimony before the judicial inquiry last Friday, British law prevented Ms. Brooks from answering questions relating directly to the criminal investigations for fear of prejudicing any future trial.
But in a remarkable glimpse of the relationship between the Murdoch press and politicians, she tallied her contacts with Mr. Cameron, saying they kept in touch by telephone, text message and e-mail; met at lunches and dinners; and socialized at cocktail parties, birthday parties, summer outings, Christmas celebrations and, in one heady instance, on a yacht in Greece.
She even found herself, she said, correcting Mr. Cameron on his text message language.
"Occasionally he would sign them LOL 'lots of love,'" Ms. Brooks told the Leveson Inquiry on media ethics and practices, speaking of Mr. Cameron's text messages to her when he was the leader of the opposition, "until I told him it meant 'laugh out loud.' Then he didn't use that anymore."

© 2012 The New York Times Company Truthout has licensed this content. It may not be reproduced by any other source and is not covered by our Creative Commons license.

'via Blog this'